Now I have Revise Resubmit at two Journals (not bad, theory). I wanted to pick better Journal (the First), but thinking better strategy is splitting paper in two papers, because referees at First Journal like Main Theorem and editor on Second Journal like Application. Then I have two publication, better than one. But papers are shorten than one paper. My question: is it complementarity in papers, so one paper is better than two, or is two papers better (considering lower rank)???
↧
